This publication was made possible through
the support of the Media Support Foundation.
Editorial
Board
Lolita Jablonskiene, Ingrida Korsakaite, Vaclovas Krutinis, Bronius
Leonavicius
Editor
Danute
Zoviene
Designer
Eugenijus
Karpavicius
Computer lay-out
Ramune Januseviciute
Stylist
Egle
Bertasiene
Translators
Ausra Simonaviciute
|
CONTENTS
theme:
Public Spaces and Art
4 Laima Kreivyte Gliding over Temporary
Surfaces
8 Conversation Monumental Art in a New
Historical Situation
|
|
|
|
/7-1.jpg)
Eglë
Valiute. Stained-glass at St Trinity church, Panevezys.
1990–1991, 1999
|
| |
|
/7-2.jpg)
Gediminas
Jokubonis. Monument for Antanas Baranauskas in Seinai (Poland).
Granite, h 360. Architect - Vytautas Cekanauskas.
|
| |
|
|
Gliding
over Temporary Surfaces
by Laima Kreivyte
How has the traditional structure of monumental art – commissioner/artist/society
– changed in Lithuania at the end of the millennium? Are private individuals
capable of financing this expensive representational art? At first sight
this art genre does not seem to be on the verge of extinction, if you
look at a large variety of new works created for public and private
interiors, churches etc. However, in order to make sure what place monumental
art occupies in the context of dynamically changing visual city spaces,
we should try to look at them from the viewpoint of contemporary society.
Though “homogeneous” society no longer exists, monumental art (of its
own free will?) is still limited by modernistic requirements of universalism.
Artists create elevated oeuvres, cautiously trying to modernize millennium-old
iconographic forms without changing their context. Certainly, this attitude
is derived not only from the artists’ modernistic position, but also
from the commissioners’ standpoint – a wish to perpetuate and represent
themselves. But who will want to buy the eternity in a new package?
Repetition is the engine of the mechanism of remembrance that tosses
the present among the cogwheels of cyclical time. This classical mechanism
of “contemporizing the present” is used in creating frescoes and stained
glasses for churches. In the sacral space, where the rites unifying
society are being regularly repeated, this attitude can be fruitful.
It is more difficult to implant it into the ever-changing city spaces.
At the end of the 20th century the cityscape has become unstable and
changeable, and accustomed us to noticing variable visual structures.
The perception of the city as an explicitly defined and stable spatial
structure was replaced by the theatrical logic of surface – the strategy
of advertisement, label, make-up and mask. The wall of a building that
has survived throughout the centuries is regarded not as a boundary
separating the outer and inner, private and public space, but as a place
for information, a background for a visual and verbal message. Instead
of occupying a majestic place in urban landscape, sculpture is made
to compete with fashionable images. And it inevitably loses.
Not only the physical space has changed. Citizens inhabiting it also
became different. An observer and demonstrator (on festive occasions)
gave way to an always hurrying consumer, for whom the city begins and
ends with a car/trolley-bus/roller-skates, and the public space shrinks
to functional zones: home-office-supermarket (+entertainment according
to everyone’s needs). In a certain sense, the city has lost its body
– what has remained is the skin, intestines and the system of blood
circulation (perhaps digestion or elimination), i.e. transport.
Crammed with commercial and political posters, the city has lost not
only monumentality, but also the rhetoric of eternity. A noble and unforgettable
spectacle tends to be related with temporality and temporal art forms.
Adapting itself to the contemporary mutations of public space, the search
for monumentality takes a more mobile expression. Historical memory
is “revived” on the cinema or TV screen and gets the spectator involved
by its optical and sound effects.
To generalize, one could say that in the context of visual temptations
and aggression, monumental art finds itself at the crossroads of “eternity”
and temporality. Closed in the hermetic field of traditional aesthetics,
its decorative and representational function does not leave any place
for active perception. If sacral art can be contemplated irrespective
of the changing social context, works created for public interiors and
spaces cannot further ignore the current changes. Therefore the strategies
of contemporary monumental art are becoming more similar to the analysis
of the social and cultural context.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
/12-1.jpg)
Nijole
Vilutyte. Fresco Small Cloud. Cafe „Sesupe“, Vilnius (archit.
Juozas Sipalis). 387 x 425, 1982–1984. Demolished.
|
| |
|
/15.jpg)
Nijole
Vilutyte. Fresco of five parts Milky Way. Palace of Ritual Service,
Vilnius (archit. Ceslovas Mazuras). 80 x 275; 90 x 465; 85 x 655;
100 x 830; 225 x 1150, 1987–1989
|
| |
|
Monumental
Art in a New Historical Situation
The project
and cycle of exhibitions “Unknown Lithuanian Art of the Last Decade
of the 20th Century” launched by the Lithuanian Artists’ Association
in 1999 has an aim to draw society’s attention to the changed situation
in art. During the first decade of independent Lithuania, with the disintegration
of the structures that regulated the art processes in the Soviet period,
and with the formation of new art institutions, art found itself on
the fringes – the state was unable to accumulate the art heritage in
a consistent way. This concerned painting, sculpture and graphic art,
as well as monumental arts, whose condition is deplorable today. It
resulted not only from the change of the concept of “public space”,
but also from the commissioner’s status. Up to 1990, works of monumental
art – frescoes, stained glasses, mosaics – most often were commissioned
by state institutions, and now their commissioners are private individuals,
banks and the church.
Therefore, the first topic of the conversation is the protection and
fate of contemporary works of monumental art in a new historical situation.
Another reason for this conversation was two exhibitions held at the
end of 1999 and the beginning of 2000 – exhibition of contemporary stained
glasses at the “Arka” gallery and exhibition “Fresco” at the Lithuanian
Artists’ Palace. These exhibitions have shown that even in the changed
historical situation, talented creators of monumental art are still
to be found in Lithuania. What is the fate of the works they create,
and what rights do their authors have? So, the second topic of this
conversation is an artist’s freedom and a commissioner’s taste. On the
whole, can an artist creating works of monumental art on commission
feel free in what he is doing?
Participants of the conversation raised the following questions: does
the state have a policy of protecting the legacy of contemporary monumental
art, and what is the place of this legacy in our culture? Are the stained
glasses, frescoes and mosaics created in the last decades of the 20th
century and during the first decade of independence documented anywhere?
The concept of “public space” having changed, is there any system helping
to establish who is in charge of registering and protecting those works?
Finally, are the works damaged by time and physical factors being restored,
and what institutions finance the restoration works?
The conversation took place on March 9th, 2000 at the Lithuanian Artists’
Association, and its participants were the chief state inspector of
the Department of Protection of Cultural Values, art critic Dalia Krűminienë,
advisor of the Government of Lithuania, doctor of art theory Nijolë
Tumënienë, professor of Vilnius Art Academy, architect Algimantas Mačiulis,
director of the Section of Visual and Applied Arts and Photography of
the Lithuanian Association of Authors’ Rights Gabrielë Napruđienë, chief
controller of the Lithuanian Artists’ Association, stained glass artist
Irena Lipienë, winner of the Government Award in 1999, stained glass
artist Nijolë Vilutytë, and art critic Danutë Zovienë. The participants
of the conversation drew up a draft of address to the Commission of
Culture and Education of the Lithuanian Seimas, the Government and the
Ministry of Culture expressing their concern for the fate of works of
monumental art created in the last decades and the necessity of registering,
conserving, restoring and protecting them.
|
| |
|
|
/22-1.jpg)
Janis
Mitreviecs (Latvia). Clouds over the See. Oil on canvas, 195 x
245, 1998
|
| |
|
/22-2.jpg)
Jonas
Gasiunas (Liethuania). Bat Vamp Domino. Oil on canvas, keeped
on the light drawing, 190 x 400, 2000
|
| |
|
/23.jpg)
Erik A.
Frandsen (Denmark). Laika. Enamel, alumiuim, 200 x 145, 1998
|
| |
|
/25.jpg)
Romas
Dalinkevicius. Memory. Pasteboard, acrylic, 100 x 100, 1992
|
| |
|
Painting in 2000: Between Entropy and
Structures
by Erika
Grigoraviciene
Vilnius
painting triennials were launched in 1969. Participants of the first
triennials (1969, 1972) were 10 artists from Latvia and Estonia and
20 artists from Lithuania. Since the 5th triennial guest artists are
invited. The first guest artists were three Russian painters, followed
by artists from Armenia, Moldavia and other Soviet republics. The 10th
Vilnius painting triennial took place in 1996 with the participation
of 10 Estonian, 10 Latvian and 15 Lithuanian artists. Two Swedish artists
exhibited their works as guests. The 11th Vilnius painting triennial
took place four years later. For the first time it was held according
to a new principle – the collection was compiled by curator Evaldas
Stankevičius who won the competition for the conception of Vilnius painting
triennial staged by the Lithuanian Artists’ Association and the Contemporary
Art Centre. Participants of this triennial are six Lithuanian artists,
three from Estonia, Latvia, Norway and Sweden, two from Switzerland,
Denmark, Finland and Hungary, and one from Austria, Belgium, Germany,
Italy, Holland, Poland and Russia.
In the words
of the curator of the Vilnius painting triennial Evaldas Stankevičius,
“this exhibition focuses on painting as a means of expression and aims
at reviewing its diverse contemporary modes and strategies by analysing
an intersection of two extremes: meta-painting (painting about painting)
and analytic-conceptual painting”. However, contemporary painting not
only reflects its own history and seeks to be part of the discourse
of the humanities, i.e. it is not limited to creating a text or meta-text.
Painting is also (and first of all) related with reality – the development
of material civilisation and its relics, the daily routine, behaviour
and social relations. Painting becomes a field where the difference
not only between a sign and its meaning (image), but also between a
sign and its reference may disappear. Due to its materiality and tangibility,
a painting is identical to a fragment of reality; it is both a mirror
and its shadow, representation and presentation. Self-reflection in
painting should not be left without notice. Besides a flirtation with
photography, cinema, videotapes and totally dematerialised digital image
production, painting is engaged in historical polemics with the disappearing
expressionistic format, whose manifestations are often considered as
anachronism in the second half of the 20th century. Nowadays artists
allow structures, already created or discovered, to speak for themselves.
Painting survives as a system based on “alchemical” bluff and savoire
faire.
|
/24.jpg)
Nina
Roos (Finland). Untitled. Acrylic glass, oil, 155 x 142, 1999
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
/28.jpg)
Arunas
Vaitkunas. Portrait of Justinas. Oil on canvas, 100 x 70, 1983–1984
|
| |
|
/29-1.jpg)
Rimvidas
Jankauskas-Kampas. Neglected Synagoge. Oil on canvas, 153,5 x
157, 1993
|
| |
|
/29-2.jpg)
Elena
Balsiukaite. Nigt stoll life. Oil on canvas, 110 x 95, 1990
|
| |
|
The Generation
of the Turning Point: Teachers and
Pupils
by Egle
Komkaite
A new permanent
exhibition “The Generation of the Turning Point: Teachers and Pupils”
compiled from the collections of the National M.K.Čiurlionis Art Museum
has been opened at the Kaunas Picture Gallery. The term “generation
of the turning point” refers to the beginning of the artists’ career
rather than their age, i.e. the period of reforms initiated by Mikhail
Gorbachev and the restoration of Lithuania’s independence. The world
outlook of these artists had been formed in the period of stagnation,
and therefore they experienced the influence of the official ideologized
art. The obligatory model of Soviet pseudo-culture produced moods of
desperate resistance, indifference to social affairs, and hindered the
free formation of artistic views.
The present situation of the generation of “the turning point” is rather
strange. On one hand, today they already belong to the middle generation.
On the other, they still are the youngest artists in Kaunas. With the
exception of the group POST-ARS, this generation joined the art scene
in Kaunas rather steadily. Their appearance was related with conflict
only in terms of their rejection of the existing order. Having refused
to represent the social reality, these artists adhered to a highly individualized
and personified concept of life, considering individual existence as
its most valuable part. Most often they represent objects of daily environment
– flowers on windowsills, bottles in dumps, ruins… Some artists of this
generation continue the traditions of the Lithuanian ARS group, while
the work of others is marked with the influence of contemporary Western
painting.
|
| |
|
|
/40-1.jpg)
Mindaugas
Navakas. Hook. Rolled leafed steel, 500 x 300 x 150, 1994.
|
| |
|
/40-2.jpg)
Mindaugas
Navakas. Three Grand Dependent. Leafed
steel, 900 x 120 x 55; 850
x 300 x 60; 800 x 350 x 100, 1994
|
| |
|
Mindaugas
Navakas: Between Constancy and Actionism
by
Raminta Jurenaite
|
/38.jpg)
|
Mindaugas Navakas’
work is many-faceted. Apart from his main field – sculpture, he creates
installations, artistic books, zyncographs, photographs and even scenery
for ballets and operas. Like many artists engaged in conceptual art,
he does not recognize the hierarchy of art branches, genres, materials
or volumes. For him it is not important whether his idea is realized
in the form of a monument from stone and iron or a small sketch in zincography.
Of course, in all his works executed in different media, nothing comes
by accident. All of them are very precise, laconic and professionally
done.
Navakas does not search for a relation with nature or landscape, neither
is he interested in anthropomorphism, cosmogony, theosophy or esotericism,
as well as relativity of perception. He focuses on the regularities
of human society, civilisation and culture. Making use of archetypal
signs, he tries to change the existing established order by the intervention
of signs of his own creation. Art for him is a means to ask, assert
and change. In the Soviet period the artist challenged the ideologized
iconography of state commissions. He opposed the oppressing violence
with the resolution and feat of energy of an individual hero by casting
huge granite monuments in the form of a table, chair and tool that were
set up at the seaside.
The need for a radical argument about life and the urbanistic situation
gave rise to Navakas’ series of projects of fictional sculptures, later
accumulated in his “Vilnius Notebooks”. By means of photomontage Navakas
placed projects of his sculptures on famous historical and architectural
monuments of Vilnius.
/41-1.jpg) /41-2.jpg)
/41-4.jpg) /41-5.jpg)
/41-7.jpg) /41-8.jpg)
Mindaugas Navakas. Composition of slides, 1998
|
| |
|
|
/43-1.jpg)
Stasys
Eidrigevicius. Gates. Pasteboard, wood, pastel, 1989
|
| |
|
/43-2.jpg)
Stasys
Eidrigevicius. Onute. Pasteboard, wood, pastel, 1989
|
| |
|
/44.jpg)
Stasys
Eidrigevicius. Alphabet (some of the letters suffer wrong because
of the place in the alphabet). Pastel, paper, 42 x 29,5, 1991
|
| |
|
Stasys’
Metamorphoses
by Ingrida
Korsakaite
|
/42.jpg)
|
The phenomenon
of Stasys Eidrigevičius has received many interpretations. There have
been many attempts to describe the sources of his unique world outlook
and to define the essence of his many-layered, ever-changing but still
coherent work. Some critics notice the traces of the lost native village
deeply impressed in his consciousness and the nostalgia of childhood
memories. Others distinguish the eternal archetypal images of a bird,
a tree, a road, home, water (jug), the polysemantic image of a mask,
and regard them as expressions of universal meanings in Stasys’ work.
Sometimes the absurd and distressing world of his images is explained
by the effect of the concrete historical period and related with the
totalitarian system that had influenced Stasys, and by the ominous contradictions
of civilisation oppressing the humanity today. Stasys’ original expression
has often been related with the features of surrealist art (subconscious
impulses, illogical links of represented objects). Some critics point
to signs of the pantheistic Baltic world perception, the melancholy
and mysticism of the Lithuanian character, or look for the traditional
link between the Lithuanian and Polish cultures. The artist himself
finds the poetic interpretation of the famous Italian critic Vittorio
Sgarbio most acceptable. In his article “Stasys, or On Loneliness” Sgarbio
emphasizes the existential loneliness of an individual (artist) in the
presence of life and death as the basic engine of his creative work.
All these interpretations contain a grain of truth and reveal the diverse
origins and factors of the artist’s work. The main object of all these
statements is a strange character recurring in the majority of Stasys’
works, always the same and yet different, whose frozen face is reminiscent
of a mask. The most characteristic outer feature of this person with
a thousand faces is his round hypnotizing eyes directed into a void.
|
/45.jpg)
Stasys
Eidrigevicius. Placard. 1999 (gold medal, Katowycy, Poland)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
/48.jpg)
Linas
Katinas. Sunflower in memory to Van Gog. Oil on canvas, 146 x
115, 1999
|
| |
|
/49-1.jpg)
Linas
Katinas. Fields of Arli. Drobë, aliejus, 89 x 115, 1999
|
| |
|
/49-2.jpg)
Linas
Katinas. Inverted time. Oil on canvas, 100 x 81, 1999
|
| |
|
Linas
Katinas: Enchanted by the Stars
by Viktoras
Liutkus
|
/46.jpg)
|
Linas Katinas
is an eternally restless artist, a provoker who would not cut his hair,
a commentator of all kinds of cultural texts and earthly contexts, and
a spreader of new ideas in Vilnius and the province. His work and activity
combines the avant-garde spirit nurtured in the Soviet period and contemporary
freedom of expression. Katinas is considered by many as one of the most
consistent abstractionists on the Lithuanian art scene. Already in the
Soviet period the artist painted abstract or semi-abstract works that
shocked ideological censors, and created paintings totally abandoning
himself to visions, fantasy and premonitions. He still continues to
work in the same vein. He was one of those artists who liberated the
primeval freedom of improvisation. However, nearly all abstractions
by Katinas contain imprints of nature, inlays of the most banal traces
of everyday life. Active rhythm of colours, sudden brush strokes and
jagged movements of line are derived from his active reaction and interaction
with the environment. Nature inspires and nurtures the artist. Many
critics notice the artist’s fondness for cosmological associations:
in his paintings forms expand, flow and intertwine as a result of the
processes taking place in the universe. On the other hand, Katinas’
works contain numerous cultural associations, remarks and comparisons
that form a universal link of the cultural time and space.
The work by this artist defies all parameters of art criticism – he
seems to constitute an art trend and style in himself. His paintings
go beyond the limits of traditional taste and perception.
|
| |
|
|
/52.jpg)
Danute
Graziene. Fragments. Ofort, aqvatinta, 17,5 x 17,5, 2000
|
| |
|
/53.jpg)
Danute
Graziene. Antigone. Ofort, aqvatinta, 24,5 x 16, 1995
|
| |
|
Danute
Graziene: A Miracle of Eternal
Joy
by Dalia
M. Valanciute
|
/50.jpg)
|
Having
started her artistic career from linocuts, now the graphic artist Danutë
Graţienë makes etchings. Though she is very moderate and consistent,
her etchings are obvious marks of the stylistic systems reflecting changes
in her creative work. One of the characteristic features of her work
is the emphasis on the inner state conveyed through the form, colour
and texture. The formal change of her visual system was very subtle
– from linear drawing to more complex expression, rich textures and
pictorial arrangement of colours. The artist is fond of improvisation
inspired by visions and childhood dreams. She consciously avoids concrete
subject matter and makes use of the structural links between symbolic
constructions and their visual expression. Her etchings become a kind
of mysterious index of colour, line and drawing, a calligraphic code
of characters giving rise to new meanings. These etchings-indexes create
a changing context, as the artist, though referring to myths and cultural
quotations, rejects the need to illustrate concrete texts.
Graţienë is mysterious. Her etchings are “silent”. The shapes of the
outer world are perceived by intuition. The motif of reality is synthesized
to abstraction, though hints of concrete forms still remain. In Graţienë’s
works easily recognizable signs of the sensual reality turn into impressionistic
moods and abstract forms. Her monotypes and etchings are many-layered,
polyphonic and polysemantic works imbued with play, mystery and silence,
subtle ornamentation and subdued decorativeness and radiating mysterious
beauty.
|
|
|
|
/56.jpg)
Vygintas
Paulauskas. She. Uncoloured frosted glass, h 60, 1998
|
| |
|
/57.jpg)
Vygintas
Paulauskas. Local. Coloured frosted glass, h 60, 1999
|
| |
|
Vygintas
Paulauskas, A Glassmaker
of the New Generation
by
Raimonda Kogelyte-Simanaitiene
|
/54.jpg)
|
Celebrating
his 40th anniversary this year, Vygintas Paulauskas is perhaps the oldest
among the actively working glassmakers of the middle generation. Artists
of this generation develop conceptual glassmaking in Lithuania.
Paulauskas’ works are noted for original themes. The artist is faithful
to his favourite technology of hot glass blowing. The focus of Paulauskas’
interest is the interpretation of the human figure. Motifs of a mask,
face, bust and torso are developed both in rounded forms and relief
compositions. The artist effectively combines expressive variations
of one motif (interpretations in the spirit of pop art, realism or surrealism)
and technical “tricks” that make Paulauskas’ works unique and distinguish
them from works by other glassmakers.
Another remarkable feature of the artist’s works is irony. It dwells
in various bizarre motifs, often borrowed from daily life and transformed
in the mass of glass. Clowns, fish, earthworms, amulets and different
strange items intrigue us with their unexpected silhouettes and forms.
Paulauskas’ works also contain an element of eroticism felt in the intertwined
forms of humans and animals.
Paulauskas’ work is related with the global tendencies of glassmaking
in the 9th and 10th decades by his fondness for combining different
materials: glass and wood, glass and metal, glass and wire etc. In this
way he expands the boundaries of visual expression of his works. He
also actively experiments with colour – contrasts of bright red, green
and blue paints of glass powder pulsate with energy and have an active
effect on the environment.
|
| |
|
|
/59-1.jpg)
Vytautas
Kasiulis (1918–1995). Violoncello. Oil on canvas, 1965
|
| |
|
/59-2.jpg)
Alfonsas
Dargis (1909–1996). Homeless. Oil on canvas, 1980
|
| |
|
Art
in Exile: Instead of an Epilogue
by
Laima Lauckaite
A
large exhibition of Lithuanian art in exile was opened at the Radvilos
Palace in Vilnius in March 2000. The bulk of the exhibition consists
of the collection of the Čiurlionis Gallery in Chicago, sent back to
homeland by legacy. The largest collection of art in exile has finally
returned to Lithuania, and this was the main stimulus for staging this
exhibition. However, the exhibition provokes many questions: what is
our relationship with the heritage of art in exile today, how do we
understand it and what is its significance for our art? The Lithuanian
Art Museum somehow did not present this collection as a separate phenomenon,
but called it “the return of the art in exile” and supplemented it with
works from its own collections. If the artistic level of the collection
was not high enough, it should have been improved by more rigorous selection,
as the exhibition is too diverse and crammed with works. It is not quite
clear why the Čiurlionis Gallery, the museum’s collections and individual
collections had to be shown at the same time. Art in exile is noted
for a large variety of styles, trends and different artistic levels,
but this diversity has caught the exhibition’s organizers unawares and
as a result, the exhibition lacks a more explicit conception.
|
| |
|
|
/61-1.jpg)
Fragment
of Kazys Varnelis' museum interior.
|
| |
|
/62-1.jpg)
Kazys
Varnelis. The Large Composition. Oil on canvas, 200 x 276, 1996.
|
| |
|
/62-2.jpg)
Kazys
Varnelis. Yellow Tea-pot. Oil on canvas, 173 x 173, 1997
|
| |
|
/64.jpg)
Kazys
Varnelis. Untitled. Oil on canvas, 153 x 153, 1999
|
| |
|
Kazys
Varnelis’ Collection
by Ieva
Kuiziniene
Kazys
Varnelis was born in the town of Alsëdţiai, Ţemaitija, and studied at
the Kaunas Institute of Applied Art under professor Stasys Uđinskas.
During the Second World War he retreated from Lithuania. In 1945 he
graduated from the Vienna Art Academy. While living in Stuttgart, Varnelis
made the acquaintance of Ottomar Domnic, a doctor, art sponsor and admirer
of German abstractionism, whose collection became an important impulse
for him to take interest in abstract art. In 1949 the artist settled
in the United States.
Already as a student Varnelis used to collect ethnographic objects in
villages, photographed and drew them. It is difficult to say when he
acquired the first item for his collection. Taking interest in everything
that surrounded him – history, architecture, sculpture, painting and
literature – he slowly started to accumulate a large and interesting
collection. The major part of his present collection was acquired in
various auctions and sales in America and Europe.
The artist acknowledges that at first he did not think that this collection
could travel to Lithuania. Nobody had expected that Lithuania would
become independent. Only the latest exhibits have been acquired with
a view to the collections of Lithuanian museums and what they lack.
In 1997 Varnelis invited the rector of Vilnius Art Academy Arvydas Đaltenis
to the United States to help him decide if it was worth while taking
his collection to Lithuania. Encouraged by the rector, Varnelis took
a decision to establish a museum accommodating his collection. It took
a long time for the museum to be equipped. Now it has received a juridical
status. Though the most difficult work is already finished, it remains
to take an inventory of the stocks, to systemize the archives and catalogue
the library.
|
/61-2.jpg)
Collection
of bronze sculptures.
|
| |
|
/65-1.jpg)
Fragment
of expozition
|
| |
|
/65-2.jpg)
Fragment
of expozition of modern (1950-1970) furniture design.
|
| |
|
| |
CONTENTS
|
|
/71-1.jpg)
Egle Rakauskaite. Chocolate crucifixesi. Chocolate, h 420, 2040
units., 1995
|
| |
|
Another
Europe
This year the
national gallery Jeu de Paume in Paris held an exhibition “Another Europe”
(curators Lorand Hegyi, Viktor Misiano and Anda Rottenberg). Among the
participants of this exhibition was the Lithuanian artist Eglë Rakauskaitë
who presented a wall hung up with chocolate crucifixes and the video
performance “In Honey”.
|
/71-2.jpg)
Egle Rakauskaite. Iside honey. Video instalation, 1996
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
/75-1.jpg)
First prize
Martynas Vainilaitis
Kaulo bobos apzavai Illustrators Irena Zviliuviene, Zivile Zviliute,
designer Alfonsas Zvilius
|
| |
|
/75-2.jpg)
Third prize
Fransois Villon
Rinktine poezija
Designer Romas Orantas
|
| |
|
The Most Beautiful Lithuanian
Books’99
The
competition for the best Lithuanian books design is organised by the
Ministry of Culture, the Lithuanian Artists’ Association and the Open
Society Fund–Lithuania. The aim of the competition is to acknowledge
the best in book design and printing over the previous calendar year
from among books and other publications by Lithuanian publishers.
Books are divided into the following categories: fiction, children’s
and young people’s books, school books, textbooks, scientific literature,
art books, catalogues, rare editions.
On 3–4 February 2000, 23 publishers entered 110 books published in 1999.
Out of these, 30 books qualified for the second round. The panel chose
14 books – 3 for the first prize, and 10 runners–up.
1 book won the Open Society Fund–Lithuania prize.
|
/75-3.jpg)
Second prize
Lietuva. Praeitis, kultura, dabartis
Editor Saulius Zukas, designer Eugenijus Karpavicius
|
| |
|
/75-4.jpg)
Open Society Fund-Lithuania prize Inge Luksaite
Reformacija Lietuvos Didziojoje Kunigaikstysteje ir Mazojoje
Lietuvoje
Designer Eugenijus Karpavicius
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |